css sheets customizing those pages and not the brower user interface only consuming 7% to 9% of your screen. It "seems to me" that if you don't want basically 91% to 93% of your screen "blinding you", then we are talking about Stylus. That is 9.62% of total horizontal lines, not undermining that - but my point is that it is the remaining 90.38% of your screen that is "blinding" you (ie, the web site that you are visiting).Īuto-hide the XP taskbar and it only drops from 9.62% to 9.35%.ĭisplay tabs on top instead of bottom and we are down to 7.50% to 7.71% depending on taskbar presence - and 92.29% to 92.50% of the screen being the website that you are visiting. Consumed from a total of 1050 horizontal lines of resolution. If you use default tabs in the middle, my theme uses 76 rows of pixels at the top and another 25 at the bottom for the status bar.ħ6 + 25 = 101. I do not "hide" the taskbar so that's 1920x1050 usable by 360Chrome. My monitors are only 1920x1080 - they have higher resolutions but I only use them for certain map-based programs where I want to see more of a city/town at one time. I hear (over and over and over, actually) that my XP theme is "blindingly bright". There were industry rumors circa 2015/2017 that Twitter was going to be acquired by Google or Microsoft - that didn't happen but Google did acquire "portions" of Twitter. Google fully owns and controls YouTube, DoubleClick, and Fitbit (among others - YouTube our primary concern here). css selectors and users will flock to your site like a dung beetle to a turd." css code" - "If you want to follow in our footsteps and be 'dark' at night, use these. Or I supposed more than likely something of the form of "publicly disclosed.
#UNGOOGLED CHROMIUM WEB STORE CODE#
css code dedicated to the "dark theme" that has nothing to do with the 360Chrome user interface - so it seems evident that there was a "concensus" by complying websites that wanted to be "included". My hunch is that the Google monopoly plays HEAVILY into that !!! I'm not sure how much the Google monopoly ties into that. and for certain sites such as YouTube and Twitter they'll display a dark interface while you are browsing those sites. XP x86 SP2: v12, v13, and v13.5 work as-is in XP x86 SP2 but v11 requires special modifications - see this post by links for starting from scratch with a NEW PROFILE: Special thanks to discussions leading towards the "ungoogled" versions. I had similar results with official "ungoogled-chromium" on the official Chrome Web Store (restores "Add to" button but does not actually 'add to'). crx (which I personally prefer anyway) as opposed to 'adding to' 360Chrome. Mileage may vary, for me this only added the "Add to" button but clicking it only downloaded the extensions.
#UNGOOGLED CHROMIUM WEB STORE INSTALL#
This is great for those that prefer to manually install extensions as opposed to obtaining from the Chrome Web Store.Ī workaround to restore the "Add to" button (special thanks to this solution) can be obtained from here. The "ungoogled" version is recommended for those that prefer tighter control over a Google-based browser basically giving special treatment to Google cookies and violating user preference settings.Ī side effect to this approach (which also exists in "ungoogled-chromium") is that the Chrome Web Store is intentionally broken only in as far as the "Add to Chrome" button is concerned. Versions with a file name ending in _ungoogled disables embedded Google APIs in much the same way that "ungoogled-chromium" ( ) disables embedded Google APIs.
The regular version will have a file name ending in _rebuild_#. Google Web Store never needed any sign-in and so.
“Potential security risk with a performance problem.”īrave does everything better, faster and without need to install anything. Trusting the unknown is also a privacy risk! Why exactly I should trust developer “the greatest privacy extension” over anybody else? even some “Fedoru” paid by NSA to make some “privacy extension” that gets access to anything you ever call/look at. EVERYBODY can publish some privacy extension. What you obviously missed here is one “small detail”. You just have to know how, and that is exactly what those links are for. The links I provided, you can install all of those and more.Īnd a fake link, NO SIGN IN REQUIRED, for Google Web Store.īasically, any extension you can add in Google Chrome or regular Chromium, you can also add in UnGoogled Chromium.
0 kommentar(er)
